Elearning Delivery: Exploratory Study of ICT in Higher Education in South Africa
Wanjira Kinuthia
Middle/Secondary and Instructional Technology Department, Georgia State University
Rabelani Dagada
Institute for Curriculum and Learning Development, University of South Africa
Abstract
This paper reports on the findings of a research study that was conducted to explore the types of Information and Communication Technology (ICT) in higher education in South Africa. The goal was to examine the types of ICT that aid elearning. Specifically, the objectives of the study were to: 1) explore how ICT is being used for teaching and learning purposes; and 2) investigate the barriers to participation in ICT-integrated learning. Data were collected from interviews with educators and instructional designers at three institutions of higher education. Data also came from observation of physical and virtual classrooms, and Learning Management Systems (LMS), as well as institutional (print and electronic) documents related to the use of ICT in instructional environments. Analysis and reporting of the data is currently underway. Preliminary analysis indicates that the resident universities and distance learning universities in the study differ in their missions and approaches to e-learning. A variety of tools including software, LMS and print resources are being integrated. Barriers to participation include large class sizes, limited bandwidth, time and financial limitations. Despite the barriers, elearning integration continues, and learners are enthusiastic in engaging in activities, subsequently fostering ICT integration in instruction.
Untitled Document
BACKGROUND
The area of integration of technology in education is a continuous effort that
requires examination of factors and practices that can be applied to encourage
assimilation of technology into teaching and learning. Likewise, knowledge of
instructional web tools and course integration techniques is important to the
successful development and teaching of courses. A dilemma facing higher education
in Africa in general is the successful resolution of the inherent tension that
underlines efficient and effective utilization of existing resources on one
hand and intensified demand for more and better education on the other (Okuni,
2001; Sawyerr, 2004).
Increasingly, technologies are being described as cognitive tools that transform,
augment, and support engagement among learners. This creates many variables
that impact design processes (McLoughlin, 1999). Many terms have been used to
describe teaching and learning supported by ICT. In this study, e learning is
defined as instruction that covers a wide set of applications and processes
such as web-based learning, computer-based learning, virtual classrooms, and
digital collaboration. It also includes the delivery of instructional content
via the Internet, intranet/extranet, audio and videotape, satellite, and CD-ROM
(Klein & Ware, 2003).
A term used in South Africa’s higher education context is telematic education.
Zawacki-Richter (2005) defines telematic education as a comprehensive system
of flexible learning. It focuses on the use of ICT to enhance the learning environment.
He also notes that in telemetric education, print-based resources are considered
a low level of technology and are therefore included in the use of the word
'technology'. Overall telematic education includes the full spectrum of education
modes, from face-to-face education to print- and web-based distance education.
It also includes support supportive modes such as interactive television, video
conferencing and interactive multimedia (Brown, 1999, p. 30).
GUIDING QUESTIONS
The study was guided by the following questions:
- How is ICT being used for teaching and learning purposes?
- What instructional strategies that are employed in the design and delivery
of the ICT-integrated content?
DESIGN OF THE STUDY
This research used a variety of qualitative methods within the context of an
exploratory multi-case study. As suggested by Yin (2003), the case study design
is an appropriate way to investigate the causal links and the context relating
to an intervention. It is also useful when there is little or no control over
the behavioral events. The three cases were University of South Africa (UNISA),
University of Johannesburg, and University of Pretoria. Exploratory methods
were selected for this study for three reasons. First, the scope was not clearly
defined initially. Second, the amount of literature focusing specifically on
input from lecturers and instructional designers is limited. Third, the research
was conducted to determine the best research design, data collection method
and selection of participants for future studies.
Data collection methods included interviews with lecturers, administrators,
and instructional designers. One-on-one interviews and focus groups were utilized
for data collection. Structured and semi-structured questions were included
in both types of interviews. Interview data were used to extrapolate in-depth
views of the participants while the focus group approach was selected to allow
participants to express detailed opinions, and to react to and build on the
responses of other group members. A limitation of the research was that due
to data collection protocol at the different universities, the researchers only
interacted with educators and instructional designers and did not collect data
directly from learners. The researchers also located print and electronic documents,
and pertinent official university web pages. Formal and informal observations
of physical and virtual classrooms were also made.
FINDINGS
In all three universities, the researchers observed various ICT and examined
instructional strategies employed in designing and developing the ICT-integrated
learning content.
University of South Africa
The University of South Africa (UNISA) is a comprehensive, open learning, and
distance education university with headquarters in Pretoria. With approximately
250,000 enrolled students, it is one of the World's mega universities. Although
UNISA has multiple campuses around South Africa, data were collected from the
Pretoria and Johannesburg campuses. At UNISA the researchers interacted with
three faculty members and two instructional designers at the Institute for Curriculum
& Learning Development. Formal interviews were done on a one-on-one basis
with instructional design faculty and staff who develop the instructional material.
Observations of classrooms and computer laboratories were coordinated by the
Institute for Curriculum & Learning Development. The Institute is in charge
of about 4,500 courses, of which 600 are revised each year. Newly designed courses
are delivered for three years and then revised.
UNISA has several missions, one of which is to addresses the needs of a diverse
learner profile by offering relevant learner support and is facilitated by appropriate
information and communications technology (UNISA, 2006). According to documents
obtained from UNISA’s Institute for Curriculum & Learning Development
(2005), the online learning environment is organized into two areas.
The first is a non-secure web environment used primarily to provide general
information on programs and courses. The second is a secure environment that
is structured into three sections: The first is Lecturers Online, a personalized
teaching environment where lecturers can access online course environments,
resources, support and teaching tools. They have access learners’ data,
student feedback, and statistical data for researcher purposes. They also have
the flexibility develop their own course websites on three levels discussed
below in detail. The second is Students Online is an all-inclusive learning
environment. According to UNISA data, by 2003, there were 67,000 students registered
on Students Online. Students have access to online resources, communication,
and administration facilities. They also have access to assignments, timetables,
examination results, library and online help desk, study material in Portable
Documents Format (PDF), and asynchronous tools such as email, and discussion
forums. UNISA is in the process of making an online writing center available.
The third is Staff online for support staff.
UNISA has adopted several approaches to structuring and delivering courses.
In the first, Course Support Environment (Adjunct Mode) a limited amount of
supplemental course resources are made available and interactivity and communication
tools online are used at a minimal. Internet resources are provided as optional
activities for learners, where delivery of instruction is mainly through print-based
resources. This is done as a way for educators to explore electronic resources
in a tempered environment. Access to electronic environments is optional, and
online participation too is voluntary.
In the second, the Course Enhancement model (Mixed Mode Delivery), certain aspects
of e-learning are integrated into the curriculum, and are required as part of
the course. Nonetheless, print-based delivery is still primary. Learners are
required to have access to the Internet, and have a working knowledge of the
tools. They interact with tools such as online assignment submission and discussion
forums and conduct Internet-based projects and access a wider range of online
materials.
In the third, Online Delivery (Fully Online Learning Provision), courses are
primarily mediated over the Internet. Much of the course content, supplemental
materials, and administrative tools are only available online. The course is
heavily reliant on interactivity and communication tools such as email and discussion
forums. There are scheduled online collaborative activities, where the lecturer
works with smaller groups, typically nine to twenty-five.
The Institute for Curriculum & Learning Development is responsible for 4,500
courses, of which 600 are revised each year. Newly designed courses are delivered
for three years and then revised. In certain areas of the country, due to limited
bandwidth and computer access, cell phones are being used to deliver exam results
and send reminders. As noted in an interview, “…doesn’t matter
how disadvantaged, they have cell phones...we used SMS messaging because that’s
the cheapest”. The problem however is that during mass transmission, the
networks are unable to support the high volume of messages.
University of Pretoria
The University of Pretoria serves about thirty thousand students, making it
the country’s largest residential university. At this site the researchers
met with two instructional designers at the Telematic Learning & Education
Innovation Centre at the University of Pretoria who gave in-depth interviews,
as well as extensive tours of facilities, on-going projects, and electronic
classrooms and classes. The educational approach is based on a telematic education
paradigm which utilizes various ICT including interactive multimedia, computer-based
assessment, interactive television and video-conferencing, and LMS.
WebCT is the LMS in use and is supported by the Telematic Learning & Education
Innovation Centre, which also supports a wider range of technologies. The center
is involved mostly in web-supported medium, but there is also an emphasis on
multimedia. As noted by a participant, “…in our South African context
is standardized multimedia on CD-ROM, because we don’t have the bandwidth
to deliver multimedia on the Internet.” Multimedia is designed multimedia
with audio, visual animation among other features and produced on CD-ROM. The
center also has a studio for analog and digital video production, and sound
editing and recording. The center also provide video conferencing facilities,
which is used to a good extent by postgraduate students who are out of the country
as well as for job interviews. According to a Telematic Learning and Education
Learning Report (2003), 69 hours of videoconferencing were provided, 122 hours
academic modules were broadcast, and 233 hours of studio production were made.
The university also produces paper-based learning materials. As reported in
an interview, “That’s not so much in use because we’re not
a distance learning institution.” But there’s still a place for
paper so, we view paper as very important delivery medium still for teaching
and learning.”
The e-portfolio is soon to be made available university-wide application. It
is a digital record of learner’s performance and knowledge. E-portfolios
do not computer-based testing assessments (e-assessments) that have increased
to over 112,570 (Annual Report, 2003). Mobile learning (m-learning) is an extension
of e-learning, and has been piloted with the use of cell phones and Short Message
Service (SMS) or text messaging (Brown, 2003). As reported in the 2003 Annual
Report, although less than 1% of the students have access to the Internet, more
than 99% of the students have cell phones.
Lecturers do not necessarily resist technology; they are ‘very keen’.
Rather it is a learning curve: “it is not so much that they resist [it]
as a tool, but just the learning curve…they’ve just learned the
previous version…the interface has changed…and like anybody there’s
resistance to relearn the software.” Interestingly, the push to use ICT
also comes from students. As with UNISA bandwidth was raised as an issue of
concern, as were financial and time constraints for lecturers to develop courses.
University of Johannesburg
The University of Johannesburg is located in Johannesburg and it came into
existence in January 2005 as the result of a merger between the former campuses
of the Rand Afrikaans University, Technikon Witwatersrand, and Vista University.
Like the University of Pretoria, it is classified s a residential university.
The researchers interviewed three lecturers one-on-one. They also met with five
instructional designers who formed a focus group. The visit was coordinated
by the Design, Development and Support at the Centre for Teaching, Learning
and Assessment.
At the time of data collection, WebCT was in use at the University of Johannesburg.
The university has since the, made a decision to move to WebCT Vista. WebCT
is used to extend multimodal learning to the various campuses. As part of this
process, the university has developed new computer labs dedicated to its Edulink
electronic driven by WebCT technology (University of Johannesburg, 2006). WebCT
Vista was selected because of the successful use of the WebCT Campus Edition
nine years and that the students were in favor of the system.
In one interview, a lecturer reported that he was using a multimode approach
to learning, which is similar to blended learning. This is an approach to address
large class sizes. Learners are provided with study guides, alongside CD-ROM.
They then access the course lectures (PowerPoint) and questions via WebCT. He
noted:
“Because this is a residential university, the focus is still on face
to face. But the problem is we have so many students… at the moment we
have 2 ½ thousand students… In one lecture hall you have about
600 students… our tutorials are for the bridging program and are between
maximum 30-40 students which are way too much… we simply don’t have
the venues for it…yeah WebCT comes in and what I do have is I have tutors.
DISCUSSION
This study is a work in progress. The initial round of interviews, documents
analysis, and subsequent data analysis has identified that a variety of ICT
is being used for teaching and learning, in various forms, and for different
reasons. The selection of the modes and resources is dependant upon learner
and institution needs, resources, class size, and resources available. The University
of Johannesburg and the University of Pretoria, both residential universities,
are using WebCT. The reasons for selecting WebCT as addressed by one participant
was “… a company that has already shown they can be competitive
with the best.” WebCT is also instrumental in addressing challenges associated
with large class.
UNISA’s has a customized delivery system. However, as with the residential
universities, there is still a heavy reliance on print-based materials, and
CD-ROM. This is key in light of bandwidth and Internet access issues. Video
and video conferencing is also in use at the universities, as is m-Learning,
as a means of supporting instruction. Brown (2003) recommends that m-learning
should be a supportive mode of education and not a primary mode of education,
and the focus should be more on communication and interaction than on content.
Instructional designers are important to the course development process. The
collaboration between content experts, audio/video personnel, and instructional
designers helps to ensure course quality. At the University of Pretoria and
University of Johannesburg, teams are allocated to work with lecturers by faculty
and content area. The faculty support teams consist of project managers, instructional
designers, and multimedia developers and they focus on two or three faculty
groups. Given the amount of time required to prepare courses and technical expertise,
this type of support is important to program quality.
All programs are accredited, and as noted in an interview, “the government
is setting standards and criteria…so that we get good quality in delivery…every
program must be accredited.” The use of instructional design expertise
also addresses the issue of professional development, which is available at
all three universities. Unlike findings in earlier study findings, lecturers
are not necessarily resistant to change. However, the study yielded similar
findings of the challenges emerged, including bandwidth and access (Dagada,
2004; Kinuthia, 2003).
CONCLUSION
This study was conducted to explore the types of ICT at three major universities
in South Africa. Preliminary analysis indicates innovative ways that ICT is
being used for instructional purposes, where selection is based on individual
institution needs, missions, and resource availability. However, there are barriers
to e-learning including large class sizes, limited bandwidth, time, and financial
limitations. Despite the barriers, learners and educators are keen on e-learning.
Cycles of the research process will be implemented in order to expand on specifically
how these resources are being aligned with instructional strategies.
REFERENCES
Annual Report. (2003), Telematic Learning and Educational Innovation.
University of Pretoria
Brown, T. (June 2003), “The Role of M-Learning in the Future of E-Learning
in Africa?” Paper presented at the 21st ICDE Conference, Hong Kong.
Brown, T. (Ed.). (1999), University of Pretoria: Telematic Education: Focusing
on the client into the future with flexible learning. University of Pretoria.
Dagada, R. (2004), “Educator competence in integrating computers for
teaching and learning within the framework of the GautengOnline Project.”
Education as Change, vol. 8, no. 2, pp. 105-133.
Kinuthia, W. (2003), An Exploratory Study of Faculty Participation in Web-based
Instruction at Historically Black Colleges and Universities. Unpublished doctoral
dissertation, University of South Alabama.
Klein D. & Ware M. (2003),”E-learning: New opportunities in continuing
professional development”. Learned Publishing, vol. 16, no. 1,
pp. 34-46.
McLoughlin, C. (1999), “Culturally responsive technology use: Developing
an online community of learners.” British Journal of Educational Technology,
vol. 30, no. 3, pp. 231-245.
Okuni, A. (2000). Higher Education through the Internet Expectations, Reality
and Challenges of the African Virtual University. D+C Development and Cooperation,
2, 23-25. Retrieved June 18, 2002, from http://www.dse.de/zeitschr/de200-4.htm
Sawyerr, A. (2004). “Challenges facing African universities: selected
issues.” Association of African Universities. Retrieved July
19 2004. http://www.aau.org/english/documents/asa-challengesfigs.pdf.
University of Johannesburg. (2006), Retrieved June 5, 2006, from http://www.uj.ac.za/
University of Pretoria (2006), Retrieved June 5, 2006, from http://www.up.ac.za/
University of South Africa. (2006), Retrieved June 5 2006 from http://www.unisa.ac.za/
Structuring Online Delivery (2005), University of South Africa
Yin, R. (2003), Case study research: design and methods, 2nd edn,
Thousand Oaks, Sage Publishing.
Zawacki-Richter, O. (2005). Online Faculty Support and Education Innovation
– A Case Study. Retrieved July 15, 2005.
http://www.eurodl.org/materials/contrib/2005/Zawacki_Richter.htm
|
|
Learn more
about this
publishing
project...
|
|