Untitled Document
Introduction
The digital divide1 and its implications for development in small states have
been discussed in the literature e.g. Carnoy (1995), Shukla and Rogers (2001),
Perraton (2002), CAPDD (2002), and Harris (2004). Examples of strategic approaches
adopted by countries and international agencies to eliminate the divide are found
in ILO (2001), CAPDD (2002), CIDA (2003), and Lallana (2004). The concept of the
telecentre or telecottage and its role in the context of distance education, flexible
learning and the digital divide in developing and first world countries are also
discussed in the literature, e.g. Latchem and Walker (2001), and Rogers and Shukla
(2002).
This paper focuses on Trinidad and Tobago- a developing economy that experienced
an 87.4% increase in real GDP2 and the longest period of persistent economic
growth since the oil boom of the 1970’s during the period 1990 - 20043;
resulting in falling unemployment and a stable inflation rate for the period
as shown in Figure 1 below.
Figure 1. Selected Performance Indicators for the Trinidad and Tobago
Economy 1995 - 2004
Source: Ministry of Finance – Review of the Economy (various years)
Domestic and global assessments of Trinidad and Tobago’s level of “e-readiness”,
completed in 2003, confirmed the presence of the divide, rated the country’s
electronic marketplace as underdeveloped, established a baseline for the development
of the country’s NICT Plan, and identified several barriers to increasing
the level of ICT usage among the general population.
“These include the high cost of computer ownership, the high cost of
Internet access, the available Internet speed , virtually no community access
to computers and the Internet for those who cannot afford home PCs. The percentage
of households with computers was estimated to be only 16% in 2003 with a mere
9% of the general population being regular Internet users” (GoRTT 2004;
21) .
Table 1 provides a comparative evaluation of the technology status of Trinidad
and Tobago and a sample of countries of varying HDI rank.
Table 1 : Technology Status vs. HDI Rank
Technology Diffusion & Creation Parameter |
Singapore
(Rank 25) |
Barbados
(Rank 30) |
Trinidad & Tobago
(Rank 57) |
Malaysia
(Rank 61) |
Mauritius
(Rank 65) |
Telephone Mainlines (per 1000 people |
|
|
|
|
|
-1990 |
346 |
281 |
141 |
89 |
52 |
-2003 |
450 |
497 |
255 |
182 |
285 |
Cellular Subscribers (per 1000 people) |
|
|
|
|
|
-1990 |
17 |
0 |
0 |
5 |
2 |
-2003 |
852 |
519 |
399 |
442 |
267 |
Internet Users (per 1000 people) |
|
|
|
|
|
-1990 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
-2003 |
509 |
371 |
117 |
344 |
123 |
R & D Expenditure (% of GDP)
1997-2002 |
2.2 |
na |
0.1 |
0.7 |
0.3 |
Researchers in R & D (per million people) |
4,352 |
na |
347 |
294 |
na |
Source: UNDP Human Development Report (2005)
The results of these assessments point to the necessity for Trinidad and Tobago
to develop and implement policies to bridge the information divide across the
country; a divide that threatens to reinforce inequalities in wealth (Perraton
2002: 1). Thus far, the country’s response to the digital divide can be
characterised by four initiatives:
- the inclusion of IT in the curriculum of secondary schools and tertiary
institutions;
- the pilot community based learning centre project over the 1999 –
2001 period as an initial step in developing a national learning system in
the country (Sampson-Ovid 2000);
- the removal of import taxes, duties and VAT on computer equipment; and
- the development of a National ICT Plan.
Available data revealed that by 2005, tertiary level IT training was being
provided at state funded tertiary institutions i.e. UWI, COSTATT and UTT, and
at least 17 private tertiary institutions e.g. ROYTEC, SBCS and SAM. Table 2
shows the performance of the minority of the country’s 30,000 Fifth and
Sixth Form students who wrote IT examinations at the CXC4 CAPE and the Cambridge5
GCE Advanced levels.
Table 2: Performance of Schools in Trinidad and Tobago in IT Examinations
2005
Examination No. |
Registered No. who sat the Final Exam |
No. who sat the Final Exam |
No. who passed the Final Exam |
% Passed |
CXC CSEC |
3470 |
2964 |
1644 |
55.5% |
CXC CAPE Unit I – Computer Science |
59 |
47 |
45 |
95.7% |
CXC CAPE Unit I – IT |
41 |
33 |
29 |
87.8% |
CXC CAPE Unit II |
39 |
29 |
23 |
79.3% |
CAMBRIDGE GCE Advanced Level – Computer Science |
40 |
40 |
27 |
67.5% |
Source – Ministry of Education Press Advertisement, Sunday Guardian October
16, 2005
This paper reviews the second initiative mentioned above i.e. the pilot community-based
learning centre program. It is divided into four parts. The first part summarises
the literature on the digital divide and strategic approaches taken by countries
and international agencies to eliminate this divide. The second section links
community-based learning centres to the elimination of the digital divide. The
third section presents the findings of a survey of graduates from the community-based
learning centres program in Trinidad and Tobago. The paper concludes with suggestions
for going beyond the pilot and enhancing the effectiveness of these centres.
1. The Digital Divide – A Literature Review
According to CAPDD (2002; 51-52) the term ‘digital divide’ refers
to the differential between those persons with access to a particular product
or service and those without it – and to the consequential relative advantages
and disadvantages of this differential access. It is a relative concept that
measures the differentials between different groups. A growing digital divide
does not mean that citizens and communities on the wrong side of the divide
are losing out in absolute terms – they may, in fact, be making significant
social and economic gains at relatively low levels of access, but also falling
further behind their better-served contemporaries in terms of equity. The divide
has been discerned in four scenarios around the world, namely:
i. between countries;
ii. between different countries within geographical regions;
iii. within countries, between different geographical areas e.g. urban vs rural;
and
iv. within countries, between different income or social groups e.g. men vs
women, rich vs poor, young vs old, literate vs illiterate.
Harris (2004:8) observed that the uneven global distribution of access to the
Internet has highlighted a digital divide that separates individuals who are
able to access computers and the Internet from those who have no opportunity
to do so. Cole and others (2000) recorded that the Internet was adopted by about
60% of adults in the United States by the year 2000; these users were advantaged
socio-economically, racially, and in urban-rural residence. The digital divide
becomes even more pronounced when consideration is given to the comparative
sizes of Internet users in the various regions of the world in Figure 2 below.
Figure 2
Data Source: Rogers and Shukla (2001)
Conceptually, the digital divide is viewed in G8 DOT Force Report (2001)6 and
ILO (2001)7 as a reflection of existing broader socio-economic inequalities,
and a symptom of much more profound and long-standing economic and social divides
within and between societies. Rogers and Shukla (2002) argued that the digital
divide bears similarities to previous conceptualizations of the knowledge gap
hypothesis cited in Tichenor and others (1970). Harris (2004:11), on the other
hand, views the digital divide as multidimensional with the dimensions implying
a variety of societal concerns that have to do with education, capacity building,
social equity inclusive of gender equity, and the appropriateness of technology
and information to its socio-economic context.
Divisions between the information-rich and information-poor that exist within
the digital divide, are important to policy makers as they reflect a new division
of labour. Carnoy (1995: 212) argued that this division is based less on the
location of natural resources, cheap and abundant labour or even capital stock,
but more on the capacity to create new knowledge and apply it rapidly through
information and telecommunications to a wide range of human activities in ever-broadening
space and time.
2. Closing the Digital Divide
Eliminating the digital divide is critical to eliminating the disparities in
access to education, health care, capital, shelter, employment, clean water
supply and food across developing countries. In short, its elimination is necessary
for the development process. Since as CIDA (2003) suggests, information and
knowledge are among the resources fundamental to the development process, it
follows that strategies for eliminating the digital divide must be linked to
increased access and use of information and knowledge. This approach is reflected
in initiatives such as the “Genoa Plan of Action” and the New Partnership
for Africa’s Development (NEPAD) strategy. See ILO (2001)7, CIDA (2003),
and G8 DOT Summit (2001).
ICTs offer new ways of providing access to information and knowledge, and thereby
create significant opportunities for learning; networking, social organization
and participation; and improving transparency and accountability. While the
literature is vocal about the potential of ICT, Lallana (2004: 38 – 47),
ILO (2001), Harris (2004:11), and Martin and McKeown (1993) suggest that some
caution be exercised in using ICTs to eliminate the digital divide.
At the international level, the digital divide will continue to grow if only
a select number of countries reap the benefits of ICTs while others continue
to lag behind. In this regard, CIDA (2003) points out that there is a danger
of exacerbating this disparity between developed and developing countries, and
recommends action that focuses on pro-poor strategies emphasizing provision
of rural infrastructure, access of women and the disenfranchised, capacity building
and training, as well as the creation and dissemination of local content in
local languages.
3. Linking Community Access Centres with Closing the Digital Divide
Community Access Centres, also called telecottages and telecentres, are ‘community
based’ facilities that exist to assist local communities in learning,
access to technology and access to work etc. According to Latchem & Walker
(2001), telecentres can be viewed as strategically located facilities that provide
access to ICT based services and applications. The telecottage started in Sweden
and has been embraced in the UK where at last count over 200 telecottages existed.
Depending on location (rural or urban) and country (developed or developing),
they vary in size, facilities and services, ranging from basic telecommunication
services such as “phone shops” to fully interactive Internet–based
training. Psychologically, telecentres can work to dispel the fears and myths
about technology. Examples of telecentres can be found in Canada, UK, Hungary,
Latin America, India, other parts of Africa – Mozambique, South Africa,
Dar es Salaam, Uganda.
Encouraging the cutover of telecentres is a key strategy for bridging the digital
divide within a nation, and between nations, but on specific grounds documented
in Rogers and Shukla (2002).
4. Survey of Pilot Community-based Learning Centres Program
The Government of Trinidad and Tobago approved in 1997 a Distance Learning System
(DLS) that would promote and pursue the concept of lifelong learning using existing
and emerging information and communication technologies. A pilot community based
distance learning program was established as a critical partnership endeavour
within the DLS to offer computer literacy courses as a prelude to the introduction
of advanced training. Graduates of the computer literacy courses were expected
to qualify for access to online training courses in such areas as SAT Preparation,
A+ Certification, Networking Essentials, Mathematics and Grammar Skills (Sampson-Ovid
2000). Nineteen centers were launched during the period April 1999 to December
20018 thereby giving the pilot program a spread as shown below.
Table 3 Distribution of Community-based Learning Centres as at December 2001
County/
City
|
Port of Spain |
San Fernando |
St. Andrew |
St. Patrick |
Nariva/
Mayaro |
Victoria |
St. George |
Caroni |
Tobago |
No. of Centres |
1 |
1 |
1 |
1 |
1 |
3 |
5 |
5 |
1 |
Source: Distance Learning Secretariat
4.1 Survey Methodology
The duration of the pilot and the status of the records of the program in 2002
did not allow for the typical assessment9 of distance learning programs to be
made. A survey was undertaken in 2002 to measure the contribution of the pilot
community-based learning centres program to closing the digital divide and other
related divides. The methodology for this study reflects a mix of qualitative
and quantitative research. The qualitative research took the form of a document
search on the program and in-depth interviews with a sample of Managers, Course
Facilitators and graduates of the centres.
The quantitative research took the form of a tracer study of 110 graduates
of the Program in Trinidad10 over the period 1999 to 200111. A quota sampling
design was employed since no sampling frame existed for this population. Data
collection was executed through the use of a structured questionnaire that was
administered in a face-to-face mode. This questionnaire sought feedback on issues
of access, motivation, demographics, expectations, benefits, plans for further
development, and obstacles encountered in making use of the acquired skills.
The composition of the achieved sample is shown in Table 4.
Table 4: Quota allocated to Community-based Learning
Centres
Centre |
Quota |
Centre |
Quota |
Pinto |
20 |
Brazil |
10 |
Couva |
18 |
Mayaro |
10 |
Arouca |
4 |
Cocorite |
10 |
Toco |
10 |
Barrackpore |
8 |
Moruga |
10 |
Les Efforts |
10 |
4.2 Survey Findings
The majority of the students in the sample were female in the age group 31 –
39 from households with median income of $2000 –$2999 per month, and in
possession of a secondary education up to the CXC level; these entered the pilot
program with the expectation of obtaining certification that would be acceptable
to employers. Information on the program was accessed in the main from relatives
and friends. Students deemed the fees charged on the pilot program to be affordable.
Computer Literacy was their most popular course.
The data point to the potential of the Program to offer public access to computers
and other communication technologies and provide training in computer literacy,
software packages and the Internet in both the rural and urban areas; this is
critical to closing the digital divide in the country. However, the ownership
of computers by individuals is still a challenge.
The data also suggest that the Program has the potential to add to human capital
formation and contribute to widening the scope of employment opportunities for
participants. Furthermore, there was tangible demonstration of behavior change
by the students after completing the Program in terms of adding to their non-human
capital. This finding suggests that the Program can be viewed as a transformative
measure in the context of social protection (Devereux et. al. 2004) - a significant
finding given the link between poverty and the digital divide. A significant
proportion of the sample indicated an interest in pursuing other courses by
the distance mode or even a professional qualification suggesting that the Program
has the capability of honing the skills required by the individual to make the
choices necessary for transforming endowments into income.
Enhancing the Community-based Learning Centres
Notwithstanding the achievements of the Pilot Program, forty-nine percent (49%)
of the sample offered suggestions for its enhancement/expansion; these relate
to seven broad issues viz. the Range of Course Offerings, Accreditation, Course
Facilitation, Facilities, Program Administration, Advertising and Student Assistance.
In moving to the next phase of the Program, the Government of Trinidad and Tobago
must recognize the key realities below as identified by Harris (2004:11):
- The real concern must be the information and knowledge gap.
- Money and technology do not matter; rather the right approach matters.
Unless other divides are also addressed, crossing the digital divide will
not achieve much.
- The pattern of cause and effect must be understood in the context of the
digital divide and the broader social and economic divides.
The literature, Harris (2004) and Rogers and Shukla (2002), provide additional
prescriptions for enhancing the Program, namely:
- ensuring that a well developed information infrastructure is in place to
support the learning centres;
- adherence to principles of integrated rural development;
- ensuring that the Program is rooted in, and subordinate to, a broader strategy
to combat poverty;
- a sustained focus on pro-poor strategies that emphasize access to women
and the disenfranchised, capacity building and training, as well as the creation
and dissemination of local content in local languages; and
- the addition of help desk services to the suite of offerings at the learning
centres as these are critical to providing public access to the Internet .
Some of these issues are to be addressed by the Government of Trinidad and Tobago
as part of the implementation of the promulgated National ICT Plan. (GoRTT 2004:
ii-iv). Unfortunately, delays in the implementation of the Plan as at December
2005 had the effect of making the Plan almost invisible to one of its key stakeholders,
i.e. civil society.
Conclusion
This paper has reviewed the role of community access centres in closing the
digital divide. It has also presented empirical data on the pilot community-based
learning centres project in Trinidad and Tobago and assessed this project in
the context of the divide. Indeed, there were lessons learnt from the experience
of the pilot program; these can inform the design of the Community Access Centres
Initiative and the Skills & Knowledge for the Information Era (SKIE) Programme
under the aegis of the National ICT Plan. Furthermore, this paper presented
that the National ICT Plan as a vehicle for the implementation of a sustained
nationwide community-based learning centres program in Trinidad and Tobago.
The Government of Trinidad and Tobago must now meet the challenge of (a) quickly
gaining an understanding of the pattern of cause and effect in the context of
the digital divide and the broader social and economic divides, (b) implementing
a plan of action to address these divides, and, (c) adding the leadership and
capacity required to fast track the implementation of the National ICT Plan.
BIBLIOGRAPHY
CAPDD (2002) The Commonwealth, ICTs and Development. A Report to CHOGM
2002. Commonwealth Action Programme for the Digital Divide, Commonwealth
Secretariat.
Carnoy, P. (1995) Education and the new international division of labour.
International Encyclopedia of Economics of Education, Oxford.
CIDA (2003) CIDA’s Strategy on Knowledge for Development through
Information and Communication. accessed on http://www.acdi-cida.gc.ca/ict
on 01 December 2005
Cole, J., Suman, M., Schramm, P., van Bel, D., Lunn, B., Maguire, P., Hanson,
K., Singh, R., and Aquino, J. (2000) The UCLA Internet Report: Surveying
the Digital Future. UCLA Center for Communication Policy, Los Angeles.
Devereux, S. and Sabates-Wheeler, R. (2004). Transformative Social Protection.
IDS Working Paper 232. Institute of Development Studies, Sussex, England.
GoRTT (2004). Trinidad and Tobago’s National ICT Strategy. Ministry
of Public Administration and Information, Government of Trinidad and Tobago.
(accessed on http://www.gov.tt/nict)
Harris, R. (2002) ICT for Poverty Alleviation.Framework. accessed
on http://rogharris.org.
Harris, R. (2004) Information Communication Technologies for Poverty Alleviation.
UNDP-APDIP, Malaysia.
Lallana, E. (2004) An Overview of ICT Policies and e-Strategies of Select
Asian Economies. APDIP, India.
Latchem, C. and Walker, D. ( 2001) Telecentres: Case Studies and Key Issues.
The Commonwealth of Learning, Vancouver, Canada
Perraton, H. (2002) Technology, education, development and costs. A third
look at the educational crisis. Presented at ‘University and technology
for literacy/ basic education partnerships in developing countries’ round
table. Paris. (accessed on http://www.irrfol. )
Rogers, E. and Shukla, P. (2002) The Role of Telecentres in Development
Communication and the Digital Divide. Accessed on http:test.telecentre.org.
04/02/2006
Sampson-Ovid, L. (2000) Developing a National Learning System: A Trinidad
and Tobago Perspective. Paper presented at 2000 Distance Education in Small
States Conference, Jamaica. Accessed on www.col.org/resources/publication/Small
States00
Shukla, P and Rogers, E. (2001) The Internet and the Digital Divide in
Latin America, Africa and Asia. Paper presented at the International Communication
Association and the International Association of Mass Communication Research
2001 Symposium on the Digital Divide, Austin, Texas.
Tichenor, P. Donohue, G., and Olien, C. (1970) Mass Media Flow and Differential
Growth in Knowledge, Public Opinion Quarterly, 34: 159 - 170
UNDP (2005) Human Development Report 2005. United Nations Development
Programme. (accessed on http://www.un.org
UNDP- APDIP (2005) Do Governments actually believe that ICT can help alleviate
Poverty? A Perspective from the Poverty Reduction Strategy Papers (PRSPs)
APDIP e-Note 2/2005:1
ENDNOTES
- i.e. the widening gap between the ‘haves’ and the ‘have
nots’ in the world of information technology
- From TT$35,725 million in 1990 to TT$ 66,026.3 million in 2004 at constant
prices. (Ministry of Finance – Review of the Economy for the years 1990
to 2004)
- Real GDP in 1994 = TT$36,824.1 mn
- Caribbean Examinations Council
- University of Cambridge
- Cited in CIDA (2003)
- Cited in Harris (2002: 4)
- In the areas of Toco, Munroe Road, Couva North, Couva South, Todd’s
Road, La Cuesa-Freeport, Arouca, Mayaro, Brazil, Barrackpore, Carenage, Cocorite,
- Laventille East, Cedros, 5th Company-Moruga, Les Effort West, Arima and
Scarborough.
- Distance Learning programs are generally assessed in terms of their levels
of access, pass rates and dropout rates.
- The lone centre to be launched in Tobago never commenced operations.
- 8914 persons registered in seventeen (17) areas according to the Distance
Learning Secretariat